Very nice from
MA to fix bugs nearly 1% of
EU users are affected by but ignore to fix Bugs where 50% or more of
EU users are affected...
If you ask why, here the explanation:
Fixing Makeup system brings more Decay etc. = more income to
MA
Fixing PvP Bug where you can dmg yourselve with a FAP = lesser decay = lesser income to
MA
Fixing weapon switch bug or fixing "this Item cant be accessed" Bug = lesser decay = lesser income to
MA
So if you have to tell a worker to fix the Makeup bug then
MA gets something in return for the time the programmer spent, more Decay = more income
If they tell the programmer instead to fix the PvP Fap bug or weapon switch bug, item cant be accessed bug etc. this results in lesser decay = lesser money to
MA
Now the big question will
MA first assign a programmer to fix bugs that gives
MA more money or will they first fix bugs witch will give
MA lesser money?
I know how
MA does it...
PS:
Bugs fixed by
MA witch costed them money hardly ever reappear opposed to Bugs that cost the users of this service money, they frequently have the tendency to come back after one or two VU's
Hony soit qui mal I pense