Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dawis
Originally Posted by Dawis View Post
..
If loot is more than 15 times greater from Aurli then one can say Aurli devastator loots better than Argo young.
If loot is less than 15 times greater from Aurli then one can say Aurli devastator loots worse than Argo young.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by falkao
Your proposal seems reasonable but is unfortunately wrong. Proportionality doesn't mean that.
|
Well I am sorry - I totally missed that Argo young has 300 not 200 HP.
But other than that I don`t see that I am wrong.
If killing one Argo y will cost you X PED, then killing 1 Aurli d will cost you 10x PED. So normal loot from Aurli would be at least 10x as much as Argo.
Of course we can`t use any of these monsters as basis for "normal loot".
But If loot from Aurli is more than 10x greater we can say that Aurli loots better than Argo. Otherwise we would claim that Argo loots better.
where am I wrong about this?