Quote:
Originally Posted by Radio
Ahh, selective quoting at it's best. they've trained you well journalist.
Seriously, stop misquoting me. You're pulling references from other peoples words to something directed at me. I don't know why you continue to pick on my posts when I am trying to add a little balance to the thread.
This is not an argument. Stop trying to make it as such.
Re: How is that constructive?
Well, us Scots have this attribute of being straight and frank, no messing around we say what is on our mind and if people don't like swallowing it, then tough.
It is constructive because it is wikkermans perception that there was not enough content pertaining to the game (that we are here for), to receive such high praise for the event (not you, this is not an attack on you here).
re: Dinner was not a PR.
Taking your clients and workers out for dinner is not public relations  Give me a break.
re: "you and wikkerman, jack shit".
Don't try to misquote me, don't try to put words into my mouth that were never said.
I already apologies to you earlier in the thread and said it was a good article, I later said it was a "good new story". I never said it "wasn't worth jack shit", I said it could have done with more content. What's your beef with me?
Clearly the owners of Mindark will have more input into the game than I will  I don't really get your point there.
You could have kept it to yourself, but that would not have been in anyones interest. |
I dont see why you found his reply "constructive", is all.
How can you say thats constructive, is beyond me, lol.
The manner of which his view was shared, was far from constructive.
I dont care where you are from. I am from Finnmark, and its allowed to swear in court here, and swearing to policeofficers is a-okay, but that does not mean I will go around swearing at people in a forum.
And Im not trying to make anything into a argument. I havent made any personal comments.
The last comment I made in the last post was directed at Wikkerman and not at you. I said "you, Wikkerman", as to direct it to only him, I did not say "you
and wikkerman". No point in arguing over misunderstandings?