Quote:
Originally Posted by Skam
I dont see why you found his reply "constructive", is all.
How can you say thats constructive, is beyond me, lol.
The manner of which his view was shared, was far from constructive.
I dont care where you are from. I am from Finnmark, and its allowed to swear in court here, and swearing to policeofficers is a-okay, but that does not mean I will go around swearing at people in a forum.
And Im not trying to make anything into a argument. I havent made any personal comments.
The last comment I made in the last post was directed at Wikkerman and not at you. I said "you, Wikkerman", as to direct it to only him, I did not say "you and wikkerman". No point in arguing over misunderstandings?
|
Nice backpedal. The use of a comma denotes things in a series. You, me, him and her. It is also used as a pause which was not applicable here.
There was no need to make a mythical country up with fabled examples, I was only trying to put across to you the general traits of a nation.
I can see it as constructive because I know wikkerman and know his views on the game. I.e. He likes it. Generally those who like something do not set about to de construct it. Counter-intuitive...
In general:
I think the MAJORITY of people who post on this board need to be a little more tolerant of each other.
I think people should accept other's views in a constructive manner and not look to flame each others views on a regular basis.
If someone has an opinion on something, it is because they have an opinion on it, they are entitled to that opinion without being ostracised.
It is good for any organisation to hear, from a customers perspective, what they perceive is wrong with the product.
We wouldn't want the makers of our favourite game to fall into the trap of complacency, would we?