Quote:
Originally Posted by Radio
Re: How is that constructive?
Well, us Scots have this attribute of being straight and frank, no messing around we say what is on our mind and if people don't like swallowing it, then tough.
It is constructive because it is wikkermans perception that there was not enough content pertaining to the game (that we are here for), to receive such high praise for the event (not you, this is not an attack on you here).
|
Trust me. "Dour" applies at all times with the Scots and you pretty much know where you stand with them. That's why I like them
The only sugar-coating that goes on is in Radio's factory...
Avoiding all other issues around this, Wikkerman's perception that the content was a bit "light" in terms of hard-hitting, game-related content is true. It was a nice write-up of a dinner with Ambassadors amd
MA staff. In Skam's defense, the title of the article says it all "Dining with Mindark". Maybe they didn't want to talk shop or had nothing new to share...or Skam signed a Confidentiality Agreement and
MA had editing rights to the article
. Whatever the reason for its light tone and light content, it is what it is and everyone is entitled to their opinion of anything posted here or the attention it gets, be it good or bad.
I liked it. It showed a more human side to
MA and I thought it was a nice gesture from
MA to the Ambassadors.