View Single Post
Old 04-29-2008, 19:04   #20
Jimmy B
Moderator
Jimmy B's Avatar
This member is an offical EntropiaForum reporter. Click here for the lastest Entropia Universe news
This member has helped support EntropiaForum in the past via donations.
Become a premium member today and enjoy enhanced EntropiaForum features!
Jimmy B Great Arch Master
Jimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch MasterJimmy B Great Arch Master
 
  Activity Longevity
11/2016/20
Posts: 7,935
Gender: Male Ingame: Female
Location: Surrey, UK
EFD: 8,486.38
Reputation: Great Arch Master
Fame: 1195 Achievements: 9
Mod Merc

Quote:
Originally Posted by wizzszz View Post
Did you just reveal your ingame identity?

100 ped and i'll delete the quote
No, its be known since I started posting screens from WoF globals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wizzszz View Post
The 1600 thingie always sounded very plausible, but there is still an error left.
With the old data, we can't be sure if it's not maybe 1610 or 1590.
(The 1600 is a nice number for humans, computers would prefer i.e. 1536 = 0x600)
And, we can't be sure if there aren't other skills that contribute like 1600/0.5 = 1 HP per 3200 or even less, too.
Such small contributions could very well slip through the detection by fapping.
I think the 1600 thing is pretty safe. MG tested that pretty much exactly for a few skills (see start of his thread). But if people are chipping its very easy now to check how much HP is gained from a chip so thats one way to verify them.

I think the errors are likely to come from attributes, from skills we have missed from the list, and possibly from an error in assumptions about starting health.

But we'll see. What we need first is plenty of data basically.
Jimmy B is offline Reply With Quote