View Single Post
Old 06-23-2008, 19:20   #7
blubalou
Guardian
blubalou's Avatar
Become a premium member today and enjoy enhanced EntropiaForum features!
blubalou Amateurblubalou Amateurblubalou Amateurblubalou Amateur  
  Activity Longevity
3/206/20
Posts: 275
EFD: 5,299.80
Reputation: Amateur
Fame: 0 Achievements: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atraie View Post
I dont believe depth has anything to do with size of deposit, just type. My average claim size is no different then i started, im at about 60,000 probes/bombs now, using finders from tt to ~800 ASG.
Hey you guys, look at the .csv file I attached in the first post. There are 26k records in that database... I queried it group by Claim Type and Size to return AVG(Depth) and only include entries that have 10 or more for the Type and Size in question.

It does show, in most cases, that as depth increases so does size.

You are pointing out here that you start to find different types of claims but the average size remains the same... but that makes sense too... as you go deeper you may start to find rarer materials, but back to IIs and IIIs until you go deeper still.

If you know enough about an area to know that there is plenty of lets say Belk and Ali around 460m, would you want your OF-105 or better hoping for larger chunks of that stuff or try to hit the 460m and hope for more, but smaller finds.
blubalou is offline Reply With Quote