Tnx MA for an unbelievable experience!!

[Kemp]

Originally Posted by Dash Smashing

Always give it a day or two.. You know that Kemp.

+pos repped to balance out all the neg you recieved from DD.

1. I already give it a 2.5 years, so I don't have problems with a lill waiting, I am experienced in that . Just was surprised by the fact that MA all of a sudden did/does not seem to implement a new VU without technical problems (referring to the: It's meant kind sarcastically; VU4.5 etc).

2. I dunno DD and I did not expect such a fierce replies. Just tried to shake up things a lill. Get us all thinking about it some. Seems I dunno the behaviour on these fori enough yet. But that will come

[dutch chap]

I agree totally with kemp especially since it's real money that is involved. If i lose REAL money because of the mining software bugs (try mining and you'll see what i mean) then I am NOT amused. They shouldn't rush out a VU that is not fully tested. If they can't test it on the test servers because it's too big of a change then they should shut down PE for as long as it takes. The way it is now we are paying heavily for their mistakes.
And before any-one flames me... please take 100 peds of bombs and probes and go out mining and see if you still are okay with how this VU is released...

[Rain Man]

There's at least one thread like this for each VU.

[fresco]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

There's at least one thread like this for each VU.

hey, i appologise if my post looks harsh to you. perhaps woild have looked more friendly if i have added the above

[Devil Doll]

Originally Posted by Dash Smashing

+pos repped to balance out all the neg you recieved from DD.

Kemp is a big boy and I am sure he can take care of himself Dash. Besides, you make it sound as if I have some super duper neg rep button. You, of all people, should know that neg rep doesn't count for that much. Though it does seem to bruise egos rather deeply.

I agree though. Post VU, never log in expecting much for AT LEAST a few days.

DD

[truantduck]

Kemp makes good points, even if at first it sounds like whining.

A more polished and professional dev team would not have launched this vu today with these stability issues.

If they need to actually launch the vu to discover the issues (ie they are the result of a high load) then they need to revisit their QA and load testing methods.

Lets all hope that this somewhat botched VU will be corrected quickly, and that the sloppiness is mostly a result of MA using a new dev team?