Project Entropia VU 7.6

[Epictetus]

Skam to the rescue lmao. I was trying to be funny, not critical, and I have apologized in my reply to Svet's PM.

Voice, you make an excellent point. I'm not in the inner circle "clique" so I get jumped all over when I try to be sarcastic.

[Da Celt]

"All of the legacy bps should use quantity setting."

Originally Posted by Etopia

my question was on that part.
so : you saw that documented somewhere ?

Short answer.. No. There is no MA official comment stating to explicitly use the quantity setting(as apposed to high condition setting) for legacy Bps.

Long answer, using simple logic and deduced reasoning from what was stated in the release notes, I then came to the following conclusions:

1) Pre-V7.6 used the quantity setting. This is based on very similar returns between V7.5 and V7.6 when crafting Mech/ele components using quantity setting.

2) Based on my own rascal armor crafting experience, the objective is to get as many crafted items as possible, the condition of these items is secondary. I assume that this is the case for ALL legacy crafted items, more items=more profit.

But for the new limited (perm-decay) items this is not the case (as MA stated in the release). These items are worth more if they have a higher TT value. Who would want to buy a crafted axe (rep-1A lol) with a 15%TT value, you get 10 swings and then throw it away? As apposed to a 90%TT value axe. The prices on this will be interesting to watch.

For example (and this is hypothetical, no craft axe exists to my knowledge lol):
Craft Axe 1a = total TT of 30

a) With quantity setting you get results in crafting ave TT of 6peds.
b) With condition setting you get results in crafting ave TT of 25peds.

Then, both items are put in auction. Axe (b) has a TT+10peds, but Axe(a) only has TT+1ped.

[Devil Doll]

I think everyone is just being a little bit defensive on all sides. We need a good ole EF drink-n-hunt to cure this!

DD

[vOiCeOfNiGhT]

Originally Posted by Epictetus

Skam to the rescue lmao. I was trying to be funny, not critical, and I have apologized in my reply to Svet's PM.

Voice, you make an excellent point. I'm not in the inner circle "clique" so I get jumped all over when I try to be sarcastic.

Funny thing that a few people here consider that they are the only ones in teh worldz with the right to critique the others.

"Neg Project Entropia VU 7.6 09-23-2005 09:55 PM Devil Doll
Neg Project Entropia VU 7.6 09-23-2005 09:48 PM Svetlana here ya go for that- yes that was deserved.. u are now on my ignore list"


Agree, let's get off each others faces.

[Epictetus]

I will drop the issue. Devil is right (for once in his life lol).

No offense meant, my humor was not understood. ty for the neg rep.

[Eps]

Originally Posted by vOiCeOfNiGhT

Agree, let's get off each others faces.

but i want u on my face, yo ass is so soft and round...i want to lick it

[vOiCeOfNiGhT]

Originally Posted by Eps

but i want u on my face, yo ass is so soft and round...i want to lick it

Ohh cmmon, just use your hand.

[Skam]

Originally Posted by vOiCeOfNiGhT

Weird. Wonder if DD or Svetlana gets so much neg rep on their sarcasm.

Got nothing to do with anything, and Im sure they do get neg rep and comments.
I ment that sarcasm came uncalled for since what Sveta's post that was mentioned was about was purely just informing or noticing a feature ingame.

Also funny how "Skam to the rescue lmao. I was trying to be funny, not critical, and I have apologized in my reply to Svet's PM."
you have apologized but give me neg rep for pointing out something you obviously mean yourself wasnt such a nice thing to write (or did you apologize without knowing why?)

[Dash Smashing]

So much drama!

Who is nominated for the Oscar?

And the academy award goes too ................

[MindBuster]

Could we get back on-topic please.

I'll prolly delete these latest replies later, for now, please stay on topic.

Thanks.