Clarification about Entropia banking operations

[Tussi]

Originally Posted by Etopia

The real question is :
Will anshe pay back the IPO , or will she get baned soon ?

I guess neither will happen.

Just remember the last LG fiasco (compensation for some uber socs because of bugs - normal player gets nada when a bug costs him money?), or ND openly using 2nd avatar (for how long without a ban?)...

Sorry, i have nothing personal against mentioned persons...

But chinese conditions here now more often...?

Quite sure that i don't like that very much.

Tussi

[aridash]

Originally Posted by Teilk

Anshe is paying a fee for every loan she does.. but I hope she is banned for scamming the general population with fake shares in an overvalued enterprise. She wont be though.. MA wants her to buy a new improved LA when they are released...


( Hell, if I am an "attempted scammer" by word of MA for trying to offer the same service without the expensive building, then selling shares in an unregulated field has to be a scam, right?)

no. its lear shares are ok. why not try to find a way to use that to your advantage. you could issue "shares" for all sorts of things.

[Teilk]

odd.. laggy double post

[Teilk]

Edit: Should have attacked MA, not anshe

[Dox Amarr]

Its clear that someone from the banks has made a support case and practically "forcing" MA to say this . But in the end the licenses where there for a reason.....

[Etopia]

Originally Posted by Dox Amarr

Its clear that someone from the banks has made a support case and practically "forcing" MA to say this . But in the end the licenses where there for a reason.....

Seems logic MA forbiden the "bank" action without a liscence.
But the MA statement is they forbiden all sort of "banking" action out of the "MA banking" system.
Wich make clear that anshe will have a lot of problem with her IPO and buy/sell ped system...

[LostInEntropia]

Originally Posted by Etopia

The real question is :
Will anshe pay back the IPO , or will she get baned soon ?

What is worse, non-secured unlicensed loan for collateral or non-secured virtual worthless stocks for money ?

If MA has selfrespect then they soon make a second statement about issueing non-secured stocks being scamming. Give them a week to prepare their statement

[Nihilist]

shop owners should feel outraged as well.. as it would be considered a scam for crafters or hunters to loan product to shop owners.. based on what the first post says the shop owner would be considered a scammer to offer to sell product for other players and pay them back after the sell of said product..

- ; P

[Sirhc]

Originally Posted by LostInEntropia

What is worse, non-secured unlicensed loan for collateral or non-secured virtual worthless stocks for money ?

If MA has selfrespect then they soon make a second statement about issueing non-secured stocks being scamming. Give them a week to prepare their statement

Well not entirely sure how easy this would be but MA could implement a certain amount of sellable stocks tied to each of the banking licenses. I mean there are only 5 of them for the next two years. Maybe that will be the next big thing having stocks associated with certain OLAs, Malls, and Banks. That might however open another can of worms that MA doesnt yet have the man power for but maybe when they collaborate with China they will. Ohhh well its fun to speculate

[Agnus_Dei]

Good night MA, that's it with your "unique universe". One last question to Marco: When will we see "crafters licenses", "hunters licenses", "mining licenses" and so on being sold to ND & other of your fellows... to call us gamers SCAMMERS when we try to do business in a "so called" free virtual universe?!?


Ag.