Armor/Clothing Changes

[Norbert]

I believe the equipping tax is OK, however I believe that a few tweaks are needed. Armour is way more durable than clothes (being made of uber resistive substances), and therefore i think that it would be more in keeping to keep the 2 pec for armour, but increase clothing decay to 20 pec to reflect the lower durability of clothing.

[SnowMantis]

Originally Posted by Norbert

I believe the equipping tax is OK, however I believe that a few tweaks are needed. Armour is way more durable than clothes (being made of uber resistive substances), and therefore i think that it would be more in keeping to keep the 2 pec for armour, but increase clothing decay to 20 pec to reflect the lower durability of clothing.

Are you for real??? Is this an MA employee posting? Maybe you are joking and trying to use sarcasm that certainly is not coming through in this post. 20PEC !!!!

[Nutarix]

Originally Posted by Norbert

I believe the equipping tax is OK, however I believe that a few tweaks are needed. Armour is way more durable than clothes (being made of uber resistive substances), and therefore i think that it would be more in keeping to keep the 2 pec for armour, but increase clothing decay to 20 pec to reflect the lower durability of clothing.

Norbert you deserve The Golden statue of stupidity for this post.

Bump up this post ...

[Ozi]

Originally Posted by Norbert

I believe the equipping tax is OK, however I believe that a few tweaks are needed. Armour is way more durable than clothes (being made of uber resistive substances), and therefore i think that it would be more in keeping to keep the 2 pec for armour, but increase clothing decay to 20 pec to reflect the lower durability of clothing.

Have to totally disagree - not a bad idea if put as 2 pec for clothes 1 pec for armour - but wtf - 20pec a piece you must be working for MA or maybe a competitor trying to piss off EU customers.

As I said previously I believe the two systems are linked in the backend and as such have both HAD to be included at the same fee.

[Iron Monkey]

Well combined with the nerfs that have already been implemented.. There are still two thing that bother me.

1: NO fee on equipping armor!!!!

2. For the clothes...I just have one thing to say...... No forced clothes removal when putting on armor then I would be satisfied. I want to wear my cap again...

[Duke]

It really bugs the hell out of me that when I equip my helmet my glasses are removed. When wearing a face mask a rancher hat is not removed, so why are glasses automatically removed?

[Ime]

Originally Posted by Norbert

increase clothing decay to 20 pec to reflect the lower durability of clothing.

Great idea, this would decrease the lag, which should be divided by 10

[LarsMac]

Originally Posted by Duke

It really bugs the hell out of me that when I equip my helmet my glasses are removed. When wearing a face mask a rancher hat is not removed, so why are glasses automatically removed?

Seems obvious to me.
face mask is not interfered with by hat, but would be by glasses.
A helmet forces removal of glasses and hats. You COULD argue that IRL many shades can be worn by bikers with helmets, so helmets should not force removal of shades. Try that in a support case.

[Moonfish]

Carpet Tax - MA forgot to tell us about that...

Amp Tax !!!
Shop Keeper dressing up Tax !!!
Manneqine dressing Tax !!!
Plant Tax !!!
Lamp Tax !!!
Table Tax !!!
Chair Tax !!!
Cozy Candle melting Tax !!!


Moonfish

[c2carbone]

Is that just me or is the lag starting to replace the ctd's again?