![]() |
|
|
#44 | |||||||
|
Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | ||||||
|
Now: HL8 owner
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Gender:
Ingame: ![]() Avatar Name:
Tom thebuzz Christensen Soc: www.kn00b.com
Location: Skive, Denmark
EFD: 2,025.00
|
618 Tom thebuzz Christensen
I assure you - I was online WAY more than 6 hrs most days.... Must be DARN annoying to be amongst top 10 |
||||||
|
__________________
Quote:
My Best HoF loots ever | Mission Commando | My Blog | Kn00b Stats | My Home |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |||||||
|
Elite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
They put up a good number of names. With the list in hand it's obvious the top 50 would have sufficed, 100 being overkill. 2k is, imho, a way of MA to try and overshadow the two remaining thirds of the "complete" list. Points - Come on. It's one thing not discussing the average return in loot or mining patterns, but to disallow people their score in a massive hunting competition all about scores is, well, wrong. "(Note: The time limit is only checked against the first 3 positions, as they passed all checks on other users became unnecessary)" As it would clearly have sufficed to check only the top 50, or 100 if you want to compensate a bit, then why not do it? It's not like this would require a 72 hour downtime of the servers. I opt for re-released (double negative = leased? ) scores and online time (passed or DQ, not actual hours) for the top 100, or very least top 50, of that list. ![]() |
|||||||
|
__________________
![]() |
||||||||
|
|
|