Version Update 9.2.1

[Hrafninn]

Originally Posted by Nadie

Thank you so much for making all my newly coloured storage boxes look like something out of a very very badly and cheaply drawn cartoon



Click to enlarge

Barely looks better after this mini update though. Remember, they looked like clay boxes or something before.

[ZeroX]

Does MA have changed loot in beacon?, or will be same old loot (~150 total from 23 ped beacon),
i think now with warlocks it must be much better....

[Xander Catman]

Originally Posted by Nadie

Thank you so much for making all my newly coloured storage boxes look like something out of a very very badly and cheaply drawn cartoon



Click to enlarge

I noticed that all mine look like crap as well

[Argh non Ral]

Can't wait to go home and download...
...something else.

Oh come on!
Put on your beta tester's berets and wear them proudly!

[Raffaele Meiers]

Very nice from MA to fix bugs nearly 1% of EU users are affected by but ignore to fix Bugs where 50% or more of EU users are affected...

If you ask why, here the explanation:

Fixing Makeup system brings more Decay etc. = more income to MA

Fixing PvP Bug where you can dmg yourselve with a FAP = lesser decay = lesser income to MA

Fixing weapon switch bug or fixing "this Item cant be accessed" Bug = lesser decay = lesser income to MA

So if you have to tell a worker to fix the Makeup bug then MA gets something in return for the time the programmer spent, more Decay = more income


If they tell the programmer instead to fix the PvP Fap bug or weapon switch bug, item cant be accessed bug etc. this results in lesser decay = lesser money to MA


Now the big question will MA first assign a programmer to fix bugs that gives MA more money or will they first fix bugs witch will give MA lesser money?

I know how MA does it...


PS:

Bugs fixed by MA witch costed them money hardly ever reappear opposed to Bugs that cost the users of this service money, they frequently have the tendency to come back after one or two VU's


Hony soit qui mal I pense

[MoFu]

Originally Posted by Hrafninn

Go through the posts I responded to, I wasn't saying anything about newly indtroduced bugs or bugs that haven't been addressed. Just responded to someone who needs to learn som manners. Even though we are allowed to criticize MA for not fixing every single bug, we should at least show some appreciation to the fact that they're trying... at least in a thread such as this one.

Why should we appreciate something thats normal thing, they dont do it for us but for themselves, because they have to, and they cant even do it right lol. Its their work and they dont do it good. Its a fact. Im not gonna appreciate that.

Edit: I never heard about ppl pay such a crap load of money to be betatesters.

[NightwolfAA2k5]

For the moment I'm glad I decided to (temporarily) retire...

[Doer]

Originally Posted by Tzepu

Firing sound gone and no laser beam visible on some hanguns after mini patch

Does that mean that the weird synchronization problem and the high miss rate that went with it is gone, too? Is this just handguns?

[Kitten]

Well thank goodness they added a port test for the makeup!

Now if they just let me fix my face I log back in again!

[Java JC]

Originally Posted by Raffaele Meiers

Fixing weapon switch bug or fixing "this Item cant be accessed" Bug = lesser decay = lesser income to MA

I'm hoping this is addressed in the 'minor tweaks'. In my last hunt, I had both handguns, my rifle and my fap all lock up with the 'already equipped' bug, and I had to kill an ambu young with my marber.

Oh well, the bug has been affecting me for almost 2 months, and MA closed my support case without really saying anything. My solution.....I don't play EU much anymore, not much choice about it really!

Oh.....and someone tell me please, please, please.....that the soc chat bug is back again?

JC