A Tiny with a E-matter amp 102? How?

[Darker_Star]

http://www.entropiaforum.com/gallery...p?i=83698&c=20


Just asking how this can happen...a lot????

DS

[Darker_Star]

bump

would really like an answer?

DS

[Christ87]

It helps to use the search function : Amp's?

[Kerham]

Not again, didn't u already had a thread on this stuff?

Tiny is number 2. Logical, it exists a number 1. Is called "Minimal" and was findable before meteor. Problem with "Minimal" was that a minimal of kanerium couldn't be extracted, coz kanerium has 2,5 ped/stone, which is "poor". Hence, to avoid problems, MA made "minimal" deposits invisible = no find and, when the "minimal" multiplied by the respective amp meets the minimum requirement of TT for that ore, it appears. Say a minimal of kanerium would be visible with.. uhm.. oa 106 or oa 107 as poor kanerium (curious if this actually happened).

That according to theory which says deposit is multiplied by amp.

Also, if your tiny was originally 0,47 peds, doubled by the amp would be 0,94 which is.. lol.. still tiny.

So?

[Darker_Star]

Seems, that the 2.5 on the amp is not correct....


In other words you get screwed with 102's , lol got a Ematter 102 BP for seel now...



Love you MA but I can live with out you....



DS

[Shackleton]

Originally Posted by Jimmy B

The theory that lvl I becomes level II with 101, level III with 102 doesn't work. It just works out roughly right for the early levels.

An ore amp that decays 1 PED doubles deposit size. An ore amp that decays 2 PED trebles deposit size. For the early level finds this is pretty much equivalent to the 101 increases level by 1, 102 increase level by 2. However the level increase theory becomes a complete nonsense when you look at high level finds.

If I'm right, a 108 decays 15 PED per bomb? A lvl VIII can between 8-12 PED which unamped would have been between 8/16 - 12/16, ie. 0.5 and 0.75 PED. So in this case a 108 increased the deposit from lvl II to lvl VIII.

If you go with this theory, which im inclined to, then your enmat amp 102, which only decays 50 pec each probe, should multiply the TT value of your claim by 50%. Meaning that size IIs aren't that uncommon. And at your post above...

[Robotek]

Good that It was a tiny, no deposit is what scares me when using amps... fair enough!?

Robo

[Moonbiter]

Originally Posted by Darker_Star

Seems, that the 2.5 on the amp is not correct....


In other words you get screwed with 102's , lol got a Ematter 102 BP for seel now...



Love you MA but I can live with out you....



DS

Not again... It' simple math. Smallest possible deposit amped or unamped is decay of amp+probe(bomb).

In case of ma-102, deacay of amp is 0.5 ped, probe 0.5 ped, total 1 ped. That's very poor, but if you're mining on taxed LA, you get tiny. Also small variations possible.

[Darker_Star]

Was not on 'taxed' land was running the coast...did not post until i got the 3rd tiny....sucks...major

DS

[Berul]

No problem with claiming.
Ask to some big miners on CND, i remember reading a lot of people about dropping a few hundreds of bombs using big amps (i think it was an 104 or 105) and getting nothing........

EU is dynamic, in your cash deposits.....