SIB Healing Tools Experiment

[Immortal]

[Immortal]

[Immortal]

[andy5579]

+rep again, this is stupidly awesome and useful Thankyou! I especially like the pc per heal line, its pretty useful! I thought (damn, that really sucks, you get so little for using your fap, but then you add in market value, and its pretty nice )

[PW3CKA]

Good Job + rep

[DocKangey]

Just a quick post to let you guys know I'm not THAT lazy ass - I got two vacation weeks and will continue with the math and the numbers when I'm back at work.

Thanks Immortal for the additional numbers! Funny, isn't it? I think the mechanics behind skilling are a bit different than I originally assumed

[Immortal]

[Dion Red Strike]

I have all the bp's for all the L faps except the t15 =\

That being said, I would be willing to sell you which ever fap you need at TT, to complete this experiment

[DocKangey]

Originally Posted by Dion Red Strike

I have all the bp's for all the L faps except the t15 =\

That being said, I would be willing to sell you which ever fap you need at TT, to complete this experiment

Red, that's awesome!

I will hopefully have lvl20 soon and I'd like to compare the T20 with SIB to the maxed T20. Also I think it would make sense to get maxed UR125 data from Immortal later on.
I think one of the really surprising results is how well maxed L-items skill, maybe the SIB is in fact meant for a maxed tool To really get to the root of this I would like to have data from an L-item used during learning period AND after it is maxed preferrably by the same person (implying the same usage behavior)

It would also be great to have somebody using a UR-175 (either in learning or maxed) to get some data from higher level L-items.

[DocKangey]

Originally Posted by Immortal

Burnt a Full III Bio
Comments
On par with standard nonSIB healing tools.
With 200% m/u on ME, skills /ped become 0.0052 volume/ped
Large uncertainty in this figure due to bio being the only marker. (similar to only registering FA on faps). However does "make sense"

The result does make sense, treating the non SIB chip like a normal FAP. Interestingly though, it seems that the skilling behaviour spreads out beyond a certain "class" of tools (FAPs) - I know this is a very wild assumption at the moment, but still gives me hope that maybe the results of this experiment can be applied to a much broader range of tools in EU.