Laws And Penalitys

[Apple GREEN]

Originally Posted by Hulyss

Ur feeling about the game, ur wild wild west sensation, thats what think a LOT of dudes before joining and mabe the first two weak.
After that, they are quikly drived in our economic boring and repetitive jungle. The WWW tend to die.
Joining for socializing ?? were ? u have tones of better ways to socialize.
Most of EU players are focalized. thats a constat. I tend to say that mostly Womens have a strong social fiber in EU.

To illustrate even more my idea: Most of shoping booths are owned but not claimed
That mean MA will not reintroduce anymore booths ingame since only a little % are exploited. Thats a brake. I vote for rules against that.
Those farmers dont think about community they think only about profit (who can even dont realy profit).
Now, lets imagine those booths was on market and there were a competition in auction (regulated like for exemple only one estate per day and per player). That can attract even more players cause booths are around 5k 8k and it more afordable than a shop, for little investor (depositers or hofers). Then MA will reput ingame more booth and that let the chance for every body to INVEST and stay ingame with a bit of fun and attractive occupations.

I'm playing for a bit over a year, and still feel like this. Tbh I don't think that if boothes were cheaper they'd be more popular, in best case they'd be bought as investment and deed would be sleeping just as well, just in someone elses storage. Even now only selected number of shop/booth owners actually sell enough to make things interesting for themselves,at this stage it's just too early to have even more, these people who invested money and bought multiple number of those are taking a pretty big risk, hoping that in the future way more people will join EU and these shops will be interesting to have, till then their money is sleeping.

[Hulyss]

Originally Posted by Apple GREEN

I'm playing for a bit over a year, and still feel like this. Tbh I don't think that if boothes were cheaper they'd be more popular, in best case they'd be bought as investment and deed would be sleeping just as well, just in someone elses storage. Even now only selected number of shop/booth owners actually sell enough to make things interesting for themselves,at this stage it's just too early to have even more, these people who invested money and bought multiple number of those are taking a pretty big risk, hoping that in the future way more people will join EU and these shops will be interesting to have, till then their money is sleeping.

I dont sayd that booths are expensive. I say they are not available. And i say, when we read the post, that can be done in one way > monopole of malls.

[Thorn]

A few tweeks to the system may be nice but I`m not too keen on any more rules than there already is. Some things suck like getting pk`ed but it`s a fact of life. Reselling sucks but it`s a fact of life. MA could take steps to remediate alot of issues if they wanted to but it`s up to them to see the need. I think it`s the lack of rules that really allow us to be innovative in game and create niches. Sure it`s no fun to want sometihing you can`t afford or is`nt available but again if MA wanted somehting to happen they could just make it so.

[Apple GREEN]

Originally Posted by Hulyss

I dont sayd that booths are expensive. I say they are not available. And i say, when we read the post, that can be done in one way > monopole of malls.

u're right, switch cheaper with more availible. See, first monopoly can be taken away, then richer players will have to pay taxes to sponsor the less rich ones (already happening in a way by depositers paying for non depositor's loot), there is no end to this equalizing modifications. I myself don't want it.

[Hulyss]

Originally Posted by Thorn

A few tweeks to the system may be nice but I`m not too keen on any more rules than there already is. Some things suck like getting pk`ed but it`s a fact of life. Reselling sucks but it`s a fact of life. MA could take steps to remediate alot of issues if they wanted to but it`s up to them to see the need. I think it`s the lack of rules that really allow us to be innovative in game and create niches. Sure it`s no fun to want sometihing you can`t afford or is`nt available but again if MA wanted somehting to happen they could just make it so.

And its exactely why i made this thread. Unlock some locked doors.

... or chaking the coconuts

[NightwolfAA2k5]

I can only think of one thing to say: HELL NO.

[Nihilist]

[Hulyss]

Originally Posted by Nihilist

Ask questions after all i made this thread so questions are welcome

[Nihilist]

well it looks like the point of this is to keep people from buying too much and speculating on future prices.

well just what good is money?

hell why not just divide everything evenly between all the participants, take from the rich and give to the poor.

if somebody deposits enough to buy a bank.. take that deposit and divide it equally onto all the accounts.

if somebody sells something on auction for super high markup.. split the markup too all the accounts..

give us equality!!

lol

special note: if you can't decipher my sarcasm its because you haven't paid me yet.

[RexDameon]

ahhh i was hoping for some different type of laws
like i've always thought it be cool if everywhere you where able to pvp but if you did it in like a city like PA some cop bots would come after you or something and everytime you entered that city. Kinda like the bounty's Marco has been talking about for years.